Custom scope deep-dive (package/unit)

Deep-dive a specific package/unit: scope framing, interfaces, likely procurement path, and practical next steps your team can execute.

Make the scope “bid-able”: interfaces, assumptions, risks, and next steps

This deep-dive turns an ambiguous package into a clear scope narrative and execution outline. We identify interfaces, likely procurement logic, deliverables framing, and “unknowns” that must be resolved—so your team can estimate, partner, and bid with confidence.

What you get

  • Scope Brief: scope framing + assumptions + boundaries
  • Interface Map: what touches what (units, disciplines, responsibilities)
  • Risk & Unknowns List: data gaps + how to resolve them fast
  • Execution Next Steps: partner needs, timeline logic, and readiness actions

Best for

  • Technical-commercial teams who need clarity before pricing, partnering, or committing.

Typical turnaround

  • 5–10 business days

What we need from you

  • Any documents you have (even partial), your execution model, and “must-win” constraints.
Custom scope deep-dive (package/unit)
Deep-dive a specific package/unit: scope framing, interfaces, likely procurement path, and practical next steps your team can execute.
Stakeholder map + outreach sequences
Stakeholder map (operator/EPC/regulators) plus outreach scripts and sequences—so your team gets meetings, momentum, and decisions.
Compliance checklist + submission readiness
Submission readiness pack: dossier checklist, responsibilities, timeline, red-flag risks, and a clean calendar—built to reduce disqualification.
Bid strategy & positioning brief
Turn your capabilities into a win story: compliance map, differentiators, role split, pricing posture, and a clear ‘why you’ narrative aligned to buyer reality.
Partner sourcing & fit scoring
Identify credible JV/agent/fabrication partners, run fit scoring against your bid needs, and flag ownership/conflict risks before you commit.
Go/No-Go qualification sprint
A fast reality-check on scope, stakeholders, regulatory friction, and competition—ending with a Go/No-Go decision and a 30/60/90 execution plan.